EVIDENCE & LEARNING

Informed.
Open to correction.

Good intentions deserve careful questions. We show our sources, distinguish findings from values, and make room to revise what we think.

WHAT EVIDENCE CAN TELL US

Research informs the approach.
It does not certify MRA.

These sources support specific principles and boundaries. None tests this proposed MRA community as a program or proves that its governance, meetings or milestone system improves clinical outcomes.

Clinical studies, professional guidance, lived experience and community choices play different roles. Voting thresholds and pilot timelines are proposals for members to decide.

The supplied register records checks dated 6 October 2026. Full citations and research limitations are also in the Evidence Companion, included in the complete founding package.

THE FOUNDING REGISTER

Explore the 16 references.

References E01–E16 · Supplied community-review edition 1.0 · 6 October 2026.

E01

SAMHSA’s Working Definition of Recovery: 10 Guiding Principles of Recovery

SAMHSA · 2012 / 2024

Recovery is a person-directed process of improving wellness, with multiple pathways and support across health, home, purpose, and community. The framework includes hope, peer support, relationships, culture, trauma, strengths, responsibility, and respect.

Evidence type: Government framework/guidance, not an effectiveness trial.

Limitations & proposed application for E01

Limits: Does not establish that every recovery intervention has equal evidence or that MRA’s structure improves outcomes. The review used official indexed material; the full PDF was not accessible during verification.

Proposed MRA application: Ask members what progress means to them; recognize housing, relationships, meaningful activity, and care access alongside substance-use goals.

Read the original source for E01 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E01
E02

Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, et al. · 2017

Retention in methadone or buprenorphine treatment was associated with lower all-cause and overdose mortality than time out of treatment. Transitions into and out of treatment require clinical attention.

Evidence type: Original systematic review/meta-analysis of observational cohorts.

Limitations & proposed application for E02

Limits: Observational evidence; confounding and selection bias remain. Do not infer that methadone is inferior to buprenorphine by comparing these separate pooled cohorts. Do not extend the estimates to all medications.

Proposed MRA application: Treat prescribed medication as compatible with recovery and prohibit member pressure to stop medication.

Read the original source for E02 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E02
E03

Effect of a Peer-Led Behavioral Intervention for Emergency Department Patients at High Risk of Fatal Opioid Overdose: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Beaudoin FL, Jacka BP, Li Y, et al. · 2022

Among 648 patients at two Rhode Island emergency departments, 30-day treatment engagement did not significantly differ between a certified peer intervention and a licensed clinical-social-worker intervention (32% versus 30%).

Evidence type: Original randomized clinical trial.

Limitations & proposed application for E03

Limits: Both groups received active interventions; this is not proof that peer support is ineffective. Results concern a particular clinical setting and trained workers, not a community server. No direct extrapolation to MRA.

Proposed MRA application: Describe peer connection as a complementary support, use trained facilitators, and measure engagement and member experience without promising treatment outcomes.

Read the original source for E03 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E03
E04

Second-wave mutual-help groups: Examining effectiveness for individuals with alcohol use disorders in the longitudinal, U.S. national PAL Study cohorts

Zemore SE, Lui CK, Mericle AA, Li L, Martinez P, Timko C · 2026 (online 2025)

Greater mutual-help involvement predicted better subsequent alcohol outcomes. Adjusted analyses found no outcome differences by choice among the studied second-wave groups and 12-step groups, supporting availability of alternatives.

Evidence type: Original longitudinal observational study; pooled PAL cohorts, N=1,152.

Limitations & proposed application for E04

Limits: Participants were already attending mutual-help groups; nonrandom selection and self-report limit causal inference. Findings concern alcohol-use disorder and established groups (Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART, 12-step). Variation in SMART over time/place adds uncertainty. This does not validate a new MRA program.

Proposed MRA application: Offer a secular community without demanding exclusive allegiance; include referrals to different groups selected by members.

Read the original source for E04 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E04
E05

Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder

Kelly JF, Humphreys K, Ferri M · 2020

Manualized AA/Twelve-Step Facilitation improved continuous abstinence relative to comparison interventions in relevant trials and generally performed comparably on other alcohol outcomes. Certainty varied by outcome.

Evidence type: Original systematic review; 27 studies, 10,565 participants.

Limitations & proposed application for E05

Limits: Non-coerced adults with alcohol-use disorder; findings do not justify every practice used by every group, forced attendance, or extrapolation to all substances.

Proposed MRA application: Position MRA around choice, scientific updating, medication inclusion, and shared governance; do not market through blanket dismissal of 12-step participation.

Read the original source for E05 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E05
E06

Incorporating Peer Support Into Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services

SAMHSA · 2023

Peer work requires role clarity, relationship boundaries, respect for confidentiality and multiple recovery pathways. Peer specialists help people communicate with providers; their role is distinct from that of a clinician.

Evidence type: Federal professional practice guidance hosted by NCBI.

Limitations & proposed application for E06

Limits: Guidance concerns organized peer services and does not confer certification on volunteers. Verification relied on official indexed chapter extracts rather than access to the full chapter.

Proposed MRA application: Facilitators share lived experience, facilitate member choices and resource navigation, and refer clinical questions rather than diagnose or prescribe. Explain exceptions and limits to confidentiality before sharing.

Read the original source for E06 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E06
E07

Trauma-Informed Approaches and Programs

SAMHSA · 2026

Trauma-informed approaches emphasize safety, trust and transparency, peer support, collaboration, empowerment, voice and choice.

Evidence type: Government practice framework.

Limitations & proposed application for E07

Limits: These are framework-informed design choices, not evidence that a Discord meeting treats trauma. Do not call MRA trauma therapy or require a trauma narrative.

Proposed MRA application: Allow members to pass, remain pseudonymous and avoid detailed trauma disclosure; state meeting expectations; give reasons and appeal routes for moderation.

Read the original source for E07 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E07
E08

The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder

ASAM/AAAP Clinical Guideline Committee · 2024

Contingency management has the strongest established effectiveness among studied stimulant-use treatments and is identified as a standard of care; acute complications require appropriate clinical care.

Evidence type: Clinical guideline developed from evidence synthesis and expert consensus.

Limitations & proposed application for E08

Limits: A Discord badge or attendance reward is not equivalent to evidence-based contingency management. Do not launch testing, incentives, medication or withdrawal protocols without qualified program design, resources and applicable oversight.

Proposed MRA application: Include accurate information and referrals to qualified providers offering contingency management and other supported care.

Read the original source for E08 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E08
E09

Strengthening Syringe Services Programs (SSPs)

CDC · 2024

Comprehensive SSPs provide infection prevention, safe disposal, testing/vaccination and linkage to treatment. CDC reports evidence that comprehensive SSPs reduce infectious harms without increasing illegal drug use or crime.

Evidence type: Official public-health evidence summary and program description.

Limitations & proposed application for E09

Limits: This evidence concerns specific services, not every activity labelled harm reduction. Local availability and law require checking. It does not establish MRA as a supply-distribution program or medical provider.

Proposed MRA application: Maintain referrals to lawful local harm-reduction services; do not require abstinence as a prerequisite for learning about safety or obtaining support.

Read the original source for E09 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E09
E10

What to Do If You Think Someone Is Overdosing

CDC · current page checked 2026-10-06

Suspected overdose requires immediate emergency action. CDC instructs giving an opioid-overdose reversal medication such as naloxone when available, calling 911, supporting breathing, and staying until emergency help arrives.

Evidence type: Official public emergency guidance.

Limitations & proposed application for E10

Limits: Naloxone reverses opioid effects; it is not treatment for every poisoning. Online peers cannot assess emergencies reliably. Local emergency numbers differ outside the US.

Proposed MRA application: Keep a visible US emergency notice: “Suspected overdose or immediate medical danger: call 911. Use naloxone if available, following its instructions. Do not wait for a Discord reply.” Link to official training rather than inventing dosing instructions.

Read the original source for E10 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E10
E11

Get Help

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline · current page checked 2026-10-06

In the United States, 988 provides call, text and chat crisis support, available 24 hours a day.

Evidence type: Official service information.

Limitations & proposed application for E11

Limits: Do not promise absolute confidentiality or that emergency services can never be involved. Service descriptions and availability should be rechecked periodically.

Proposed MRA application: Display 988 and 911 separately; define MRA as a peer community with scheduled moderation, not an emergency service.

Read the original source for E11 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E11
E12

Finding Help for Co-Occurring Substance Use and Mental Disorders

NIMH · 2025

Substance-use and mental disorders often co-occur and may have overlapping symptoms. Comprehensive assessment and coordinated/integrated care help guide treatment, which can include therapies and medications.

Evidence type: Official clinical information summary.

Limitations & proposed application for E12

Limits: General guidance is not an individualized treatment plan. Avoid assuming a member’s distress is caused solely by either substances or a psychiatric diagnosis.

Proposed MRA application: Include mental health alongside substance use; help members locate qualified care without treating peer interpretation as diagnosis.

Read the original source for E12 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E12
E13

Participation Guidelines for Individuals with Lived Experience and Family

SAMHSA · 2023

People with lived experience and families should participate in program design, development, implementation and review.

Evidence type: Government participation guidance for grant organizations.

Limitations & proposed application for E13

Limits: Supports involvement, not a particular voting threshold, election system or legal ownership structure. Those remain MRA proposals for ratification.

Proposed MRA application: Members participate in setting priorities and evaluating services; provide accessible routes to propose changes and meaningful voting rights.

Read the original source for E13 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E13
E14

Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms

Kelly JF, Westerhoff CM · 2010

The “substance abuser” label elicited more personal-culpability and punitive judgments than describing a person as having a substance-use disorder.

Evidence type: Original randomized terminology/vignette experiment.

Limitations & proposed application for E14

Limits: A terminology experiment measures attitudes in a study setting, not a proven effect on recovery rates. Respectful language must accompany actual accessible support.

Proposed MRA application: Use respectful person-first language in official materials; let members describe their own identities without forcing labels.

Read the original source for E14 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E14
E15

National Model Standards for Peer Support Certification

SAMHSA · 2023

Peer certification standards include ethics and competencies; explicit training, role definitions and ethical expectations matter in organized peer work.

Evidence type: Model professional certification standards.

Limitations & proposed application for E15

Limits: These standards are not a credential and adoption does not certify MRA. State requirements and professional roles differ. Verification relied on official indexed text; the full PDF was not accessible.

Proposed MRA application: Provide volunteer orientation and supervision/consultation; distinguish volunteers, trained facilitators, certified peers and licensed clinicians accurately.

Read the original source for E15 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E15
E16

Covered Entities and Business Associates

US HHS Office for Civil Rights · current page checked 2026-10-06

HIPAA applies to defined covered entities and business associates, rather than automatically to every organization discussing health.

Evidence type: Official explanation of HIPAA applicability; not legal advice.

Limitations & proposed application for E16

Limits: Whether a particular future MRA entity has legal obligations depends on its activities, arrangements and jurisdiction. This source does not settle other privacy laws or duties.

Proposed MRA application: Do not advertise Discord discussion as “HIPAA protected.” Minimize sensitive data and state platform/privacy limitations; obtain specific legal advice if MRA begins providing regulated services.

Read the original source for E16 (opens in a new tab)Back to source index from E16
LEARNING WITHOUT OVERCLAIMING

Better questions.
Honest measures.

A first pilot can ask whether people feel respected, understand the boundaries, know how to report a concern, and can influence decisions. It can notice volunteer overload or a confusing welcome process.

Attendance and positive stories do not establish clinical effectiveness. MRA should not claim reduced relapse or mortality from a small voluntary survey. Personal disclosures should never be collected just to make a compelling results page.

Get the founding package with the Evidence Companion
A PLACE TO BEGIN

The next chapter
belongs to all of us.

Bring a question, an idea, or a little of your time. Help build the kind of community you would want to return to.

Help shape the community